So this example got me thinking that I don't actually know a lot about what is on the market for water- and energy-efficient appliances, or even how they work. And if I don't know, maybe others don't know either... So what I've decided to do this week is a survey of what's out there, how it works, and what its effect is on consumption. For the sake of the readings, I will focus on water-saving technologies.
There are two big programs in the appliance world, both sponsored by the EPA, WaterSense and ENERGYSTAR®, which have identified water-efficient appliances, fixtures, accessories, and systems that reduce consumption. These appliances have the WaterSense or ENERGYSTAR® label so consumers know they are backed by the EPA.
There is some debate about the breakdown of water consumption by appliance for indoor residential use. This chart from Winnipeg, Canada closely reflects the numbers the EPA uses (winnipeg.ca) (epa.gov/greenhomes).
Toilets
As you can see above, toilets are the largest contributor to water consumption, accounting for a third of all water usage. In 1992, the Energy Policy Act mandated that new toilets built cannot consume more than 1.6 gallons of water per flush (epa.gov/WaterSense). Before that, toilets consumed between 3.5 and 7 gallons per flush (howstuffworks).
There are several options for how a toilet can lower its water consumption, so I'll highlight the common methods.
Low-Flow
Low-flow toilets use gravity or pressure-assisted mechanisms to help clear waste. The gravity style toilet is what most of us are accustomed to, where the water from the tank is dropped when you flush, causing it to flush through the bowl. The pressure-assisted toilets use a compressed pocket of air to push the waste clear (howstuffworks).
Dual Flush
Dual flush toilets have two settings - half flush and full flush - based on which button you select (these are the toilets IKEA uses). Half flush, for liquid waste, uses 0.6 gallons of water per flush, on average. Full flush, for solid waste, uses 1.6 gallons of water per flush, on average (howstuffworks). Basically, these toilets don't use a siphoning tube, which most toilets use, to suction out the waste. Instead, they have a larger hole in the bottom that allows water to more easily clear waste (howstuffworks).
Faucets and Showerheads
High-efficiency faucets can save a family 700 gallons of water per year, which is roughly enough water for 40 showers (epa.gov/watersense). WaterSense labelled faucets must have a maximum flow rate of 1.5 gallons per minute (gpm) at a pressure of 60 pounds per square inch (psi). There is also a minimum of 0.8 gpm at 20 psi to ensure quality performance (epa.gov/watersense). There are a couple different ways faucets become highly efficient.
![]() |
| Picture retrieved from plumbingsupply.com. |
Aerators add air to the stream of water to increase sensation of flow and reduce splashing. Laminator flow devices force the water stream through several small openings, creating a uniform flow that reduces splashing (epa.gov/watersense).
The average showerhead has a water stream of 2.5 gpm, or 40 gallons per day for an average American family. The WaterSense label limits the stream to 2.0 gpm, but many high-efficient showerheads are lower than that (epa.gov/watersense). The high-efficient showerheads work through flow restrictors, which limit the amount of water that can flow from the head (speakmanshowers.com). These technologies also use less energy, since the hot water resources are reduced.
Washing Machines
The average washing machine uses 41 gallons of water per load - think about how much that is! High-efficiency washers use 35-50% less water and 50% less energy (epa.gov/greenhomes). High-efficiency washers don't have the traditional agitator most washers have, instead they rotate clothes clockwise and counterclockwise so that the laundry rubs against each other. This requires a different type of detergent, because the increased rubbing causes more bubbles to form and the reduced amount of water used can leave residue behind if traditional detergent is used (howstuffworks). New technology can even detect the size of the load and fabric type, and make tailored washing cycles based on that data.
Hot Water Systems
Water heating is the third largest energy expense in the average home, after space heating and cooling (epa.gov/greenhomes). Here are a few of the common ways to reduce energy consumption.
Tankless
![]() |
| Image retrieved from energy.gov. |
Also known as demand-type or instantaneous water heaters, tankless heaters supply water only when it is needed, thereby eliminating the need for storage tanks. A heating element heats the water before it exits the faucet, as shown in the image to the right (energy.gov).
Solar
There are different types of solar heating methods, which you can read about in detail here if you like. Essentially, each type has a solar collector and a storage tank. The solar collector is an insulated box, made of heat-retentive material, with tubes inside for water flow. The storage tank holds the water. The solar collector heats up the water from the sun and stores it in the tank. Active heaters pump the water through the tank electrically and passive heaters allow gravity or the ability for water to rise to pump the water (howstuffworks).
Congratulations! You've now got a basic understanding of the most common water-saving appliances for residential homes. I hope that wasn't too boring.
In case it was, here's a cat gif for your patience:




The high-efficiency version of a lot of these appliances (not even just for water, but refrigerators, TVs, microwaves, etc.) seem to be the norm for those who can afford it, while the cheaper versions are the ones that still struggle with efficiency. I think there needs to be a lot more competition in these markets to drive the price of the efficient models down. I wonder if there are any institutional incentives that promote the production of efficient appliances -- there should be if there aren't.
ReplyDeleteI think you're right - these appliances seem to me to be for people who can afford to buy peace of mind, when instead they should be the norm! There are some incentives out there, but many people rent or don't own their appliances, making some incentives unaccessible.
DeleteWashing machines use so much water! I live in an apartment complex with laundry rooms, and I know those washer/driers are not energy efficient! It would be nice to have some sort of regulation for the types of washers and driers that can be purchased for laundry rooms in apartment complexes etc. That would have an impact on many different people's average water usage since everyone in the complex is using the washers and driers. Maybe an incentive for coin-operated laundry machine manufacturers to produce only high-efficiency machines? The complexes would actually benefit in this situation since you will be paying the same price to do laundry but using less water.
ReplyDeleteI think you're right that incentives need to be for the manufacturers instead of laundromat owners. The laundromat owners or landlords can just transfer the cost of low-efficient machines onto the consumer, but if they can only purchase high-efficiency machines, they might actually be implemented.
DeleteThanks Laura! I knew about a lot of those methods, but not how they work, so that was definitely useful to read. Plus your kitty made me laugh :)
ReplyDeleteI agree with Brad & Polly that it seems like there are opportunities for both incentives and regulation to reduce water & energy use associated with home appliances.
I'm always a big advocate of efficient appliances, but there's a balancing act with the whole idea of consumerism and waste vs. newer, better, more efficient. I realize that in my house, we should probably consider buying a new washer & dryer, but the ones we have work fine... and they'll just go to a landfill if we get new ones. I wish there was a way to do retrofits on existing appliances to make them more efficient!
Also, I wonder how publicly marketable the 'if it's yellow let it mellow' idea for toilet flushing is... I guess starting with surveys and focus groups would tell us!
Great point - these machines are more replacements and really contribute to waste and consumerism. I should look into ways to retrofit old, low-efficient equipment!
DeleteI like the idea of an 'if its yellow let it mellow' campaign for home use! Sounds like a good challenge to change people's ideas of social norms!
Hey! This was a terrific idea! I found myself at a complete loss in this chapter concerning ways in which I could change my habits into something more sustainable. In my old school camp-style cycling days we had a motto 'if its yellow let it mellow, if its brown flush it down." Kinda gross but it was my first thought after looking at your graph breaking down household water waste. I currently live in an apartment where I have no control over appliances but I found your research very helpful and at least now I have a better understanding about items to look for in the future. Thanks for posting!
ReplyDeletehahaha, just read a few of the other comments and saw the 'yellow let it mellow' rhyme wasn't just contained to our group, but is apparently very popular. Didn't mean to repeat! Guess its just an excellent example of community based social marketing ;)
ReplyDelete